SUP Suitability
Excellent, Good, Fair, Challenging. A curated overall assessment for recreational stand-up paddleboarding. It considers the launch environment, water character, exposure, difficulty, crowd effects, and practical staging. It is not a formula and does not replace current-condition checks.
Wind Sensitivity
Low, Moderate, High. Describes how strongly increasing wind can degrade the paddling experience at that location. It does not mean the place is normally windy and it is not a current wind reading.
Typical Use
Low, Moderate, High, Very High. Describes the general level of recreational use rather than treating popularity as a positive star rating. Actual crowd levels vary by time, day, season, weather, and events.
Crowd Sensitivity
Low, Moderate, High. Describes how much crowding can interfere with launching, staging, resting, carrying equipment, or paddling. A highly used place can still have low crowd sensitivity when there is enough practical space.
Staging Space
Limited, Moderate, Generous. Describes practical room for unloading, carrying, inflating, rigging, launching, exiting, and temporarily placing boards or kayaks while resting.
Assessment Confidence
Low, Moderate, High. Describes confidence in the BlueGreen Guide assessment based on the available source material and place information. It is separate from a place's verification status.
Mission Bay Example
One bay, different launch experiences
Crown Point, De Anza Cove, and Sail Bay are all in Mission Bay, but BlueGreen Guide treats them as separate launch points because shoreline access, staging room, exposure, parking, use, and crowd effects differ. The broader Mission Bay entry remains useful for destination-level discovery.
POC Quality Check
The framework has been spot-reviewed against familiar locations
After the Launch Suitability Profile was implemented across the 59-place runtime map, a manual spot review compared several familiar real-world locations with their BlueGreen Guide assessments. SUP Suitability, Staging Space, and Assessment Confidence for the sampled places aligned with known on-the-ground experience.
This review supports the usefulness of the current framework for proof-of-concept planning and comparison. It is not a substitute for official-source verification, current-condition checks, or individual field review across every location.